(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

Sex Shop Analysis Discussion Sex Shop Analysis Discussion Sex Shop Analysis Discussion https://www.onlinenursingessays.com/sex-shop-analysis-discussion/ Question Description I need support with this Sociology question so I can learn better. In this assignment, go to one of the websites for a boutique sex shop in Philadelphia. For example: Kink (kinkshoppe.com) Condom Kingdom (happysperm.com) Sexploratorium/Passional Toys (passionalboutique.com) The Velvet Lily (thevelvetlily.com) Once you have selected the website, please conduct what sociologists call a general “content analysis” of the site. What is the overall tone, feel, or vibe conveyed by features such as images, text, and formatting? Is the site easy to navigate? What sort of users have the designers of the website for? When you read the “About Us” page, what kinds of messages are conveyed by the local shop (is this inviting, informative, elitist, off-putting, tasteful, raunchy, etc.)? Are prices reasonable? If this kind of analysis is difficult, it may be helpful conceptually to just look at the site for Condom Kingdom, a shop with a much more novelty-item approach, and compare it to the others.  Second find an object for sale on the site. Considering sexual script theory, what sexual meanings are there assigned to this object by the store and/or marketers of this device? What cues make you know this is something sexual and intended for sexual purposes? What sorts of assumptions about sexuality are built into the device and/or packaging? NR103_Transitions_Paper_Guidelines Revised May 2021 4 FROM THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ed improvement in the hospital work environment reported by nurses between 2005 and 2016. Yet in those hospitals where the work environment improved, “both patients and nurses reported favorable changes in quality and safety and patient experiences.” DOI : 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.1239 Patient Safety BY ALAN R. WEIL H ealth care systems have made significant efforts to reduce patient harm due to errors in the nearly two decades since the Institute of Medicine’s To Err Is Human report. Yet our understanding of the scale and types of preventable error has grown, as has our awareness of the varied settings in which harm can occur. As David Bates and Hardeep Singh write in this issue devoted to the topic of patient safety: “The next challenge in patient safety is the development and implementation of tools and strategies that enable organizations to measure and reduce harm both inside and outside the hospital, continuously and routinely.” Improving Safety William Berry and colleagues describe the complex process of taking a safety improvement practice (in this case, using a surgical safety checklist) and implementing it across all South Carolina hospitals. Even though most of the participants in the safety program were nurses, it was CEO and physician involvement that was associated with successful program implementation. Three Medicare value-based payment programs include incentives to reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Shawna Smith and colleagues explain that the administrative data Medicare uses to measure hospital performance show a much lower incidence of pressure ulcers than is revealed by a standardized chart review. Both methods show a decline in pressure ulcer frequency between 2009 and 2014, but the authors’ analysis indicates that the vast majority of the decline shown in administrative data was in early-stage pressure ulcers, which are less costly and less severe than those in later stages Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Sex Shop Analysis Discussion Kelsey Flott and colleagues describe efforts to build a safety culture at a large National Health Service hospital in London to improve adverse incident reporting. A key feature of the effort was “respecting staff authority as commensurate to that of other stakeholders,” which helped “solicit honest and helpful views.” David Classen and colleagues show the potential of using real-time data generated by a hospital electronic health record (EHR) to “detect safety problems as they occur and predict them before they happen.” Data from the EHR identified more than ten times as many harmful events as traditional administrative reporting methods did. New analytic methods improved the prediction of adverse events, which could enable timely interventions with the potential to reduce patient harm. Role Of The Patient Anjana Sharma and colleagues review the literature on patient engagement in efforts to improve safety. The authors identify critical research gaps but also note that “patient engagement safety initiatives are being implemented and tested in a diverse range of care settings. No study has shown evidence of harm from patient engagement, and many have shown improvements in safety outcomes.” Analyzing data on diagnostic errors reported by patients to a patient advocacy organization, Traber Davis Giardina and colleagues identify “four themes of problematic behavior: ignoring patients’ knowledge, disrespecting patients, failing to communicate, and engaging in manipulation or deception.” Linda Aiken and colleagues find limit- Improving Systems Pascale Carayon and colleagues explain how the discipline of human factors and systems engineering (HF/SE) is increasingly being applied to improve systems to advance safety. Noting that “cultural differences between HF/SE and health care are profoundly important but often unrecognized or underappreciated,” the authors offer a number of recommendations for bridging this divide. Anjali Joseph and colleagues review the literature showing how the physical design of health care facilities can reduce the incidence of infections, patient falls, and medication errors. They note that most research focuses on hospitals, with far less known about how outpatient care, long-term care facilities, and home care can be designed to minimize medical errors. Margaret Smith and colleagues explore the hospital characteristics related to death rates due to “failure to rescue” subsequent to postsurgical complications, which are highly variable across hospitals. Based upon interviews with clinicians, the authors conclude that reducing mortality is heavily dependent upon two microsystems: early identification of patient distress and effective communication among members of the care team. Acknowledgments Health Affairs thanks David Bates of Brigham and Women’s Hospital for serving as theme issue adviser Order Now