(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template to complete this assignment Research the issue and use the Advocacy Through Legislation template to complete this assignment Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template to complete this assignment Assessment Description Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system. For this assignment, identify a problem or concern in your state, community, or organization that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation. Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template to complete this assignment. You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Attachments NRS-440VN-RS4-AdvocacyThroughLegi Advocacy Through Legislation – Rubric Criteria Description Problem, Those Affected, Current Ramifications, and Consequences if Problem Continues 5. Excellent 23.25 points A well-develop discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Strong and compelling rationale is provided. Insight into the problem and consequences is demonstrated. 4. Good 20.69 points A discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Some rationale is needed. 3. Satisfactory 18.37 points A summary of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. There are some omissions and inaccuracies. Rationale is needed. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 17.44 points A partial or vague discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Why the problem would be best addressed through legislation is unclear. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is omitted. Criteria Description Idea for Addressing Solution 5. Excellent 15.5 points A logical and well-developed idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thoroughly explained. Strong and compelling rationale is provided. 4. Good 13.8 points Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is generally explained. Some rationale is needed. 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points Idea for addressing the issue is generally outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is summarized. There are some minor omissions. Rationale is needed. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points Idea for addressing the issue is vague. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is unclear. There are major omissions. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is omitted. Criteria Description Research Supporting Solution for Problem 5. Excellent 23.25 points Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are presented and demonstrate strong and compiling support for the idea. 4. Good 20.69 points Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is generally explained. Some rationale is needed. Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are presented. There are minor inaccuracies. Some detail is needed. 3. Satisfactory 18.37 points Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are generally presented. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 17.44 points Some support for the idea and its effectiveness in addressing the problem is presented. Findings presented are not substantiated, or do not provide evidence-based support for the idea. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are omitted. Criteria Description Stakeholder Support 5. Excellent 15.5 points All significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented and a well-supported explanation of why they are in support of the idea are provided. 4. Good 13.8 points Key stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented. It is generally clear why they are in support of the idea. Some detail or rationale is needed. Research the issue and use the Advocacy Through Legislation template to complete this assignment Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template to complete this assignment 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are generally presented. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.General stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented. It is unclear why they are in support of the idea. More information is needed. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Stakeholders in support the proposed idea are omitted. Criteria Description Stakeholder Opposition 5. Excellent 15.5 points All significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. A well-supported explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is presented. 4. Good 13.8 points Key stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. A general explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is presented. 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points General stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. Explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is vague. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.At least one stakeholder in opposition to the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are omitted. Criteria Description Financial Incentives and Costs 5. Excellent 15.5 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is clearly summarized. Strong rationale and support for claims is provided. 4. Good 13.8 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized. Support for claims is generally supported. 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is outlined. More information or support is needed for claims. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is only partially presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is omitted. Criteria Description Legislature Process and Information for Proposal 5. Excellent 15.5 points Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are clearly and logically presented. The legislative process is clearly understood and insight into legislative advocacy is demonstrated. 4. Good 13.8 points The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized. Support for claims is generally supported.Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are presented. Information or detail is needed in some areas for accuracy or clarity. 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are generally outlined.There are some inaccuracies or omissions. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are largely incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are omitted. Criteria Description Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy 5. Excellent 15.5 points A well-developed discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented. The discussion demonstrates an ability to act impartially and in the interest of promoting inclusive patient care without regard to gender, sexual orientation, culture, race, religion, or belief. 4. Good 13.8 points A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented. The discussion generally demonstrates how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. Some detail or information is needed for clarity. 3. Satisfactory 12.25 points A summary of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented. Some rationale or information is needed to demonstrate how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.63 points A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is incomplete. It is unclear how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of how Christian principles supporting unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is omitted. Criteria Description Research 5. Excellent 7.75 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. 4. Good 6.9 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. 3. Satisfactory 6.12 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.81 points Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5. Excellent 3.1 points The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. Good 2.76 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 3. Satisfactory 2.45 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.33 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Excellent 4.65 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. Good 4.14 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. Satisfactory 3.67 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.49 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Total 155 points Order Now