(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NUR 660 Week 13 Discussion 1: Research Article Critique NUR 660 Week 13 Discussion 1: Research Article Critique NUR 660 Week 13 Discussion 1: Research Article Critique Value: 100 points Due: To facilitate scholarly discourse, create your initial post by Day 3, and reply to at least two of your classmates, on two separate days, by Day 7. Gradebook Category: Discussions Initial Post Consider the material that was presented this week. Find a peer-reviewed, research article related to topics found in Chapters 20 and/or 21. This discussion post will be a bit longer than you are used to, but it is your only assignment this week. Please use the following list as a template to structure your post; include the questions as headers in your post so your peers can follow along. Once you have introduced your topic, use the remaining questions to help you critique your article. Please be sure to answer all questions. The last paragraph should be a conclusion tying all the content together. Article Critique Questions: One paragraph that introduces your topic and explains why it is important to you Author, year, title, journal Purpose of the article: research, theoretical, program implementation From what discipline was the literature review drawn? What were the gaps, issues, purposes identified from the synthesis of the literature? What design and methods were used for the purpose of the project? Were the sample, size, and setting (or choice of articles) adequate for the project? What were the findings and conclusions? What are the implications for future research? How could the information in this article be applied to advanced nursing practice? Would you recommend this article to others as an example to add to the understanding of this information? Conclusion/summary paragraph Upload your article critique along with your article in PDF format to this discussion forum in your initial post. Reply Posts Please respond to at least two of your classmates who have chosen a topic from a different chapter; for instance, if you write about something from Chapter 20, you should respond to two peers who posted about a topic from Chapter 21. In your response to peers, think about your certification track and a potential patient you might encounter with the condition they discussed. Identify two things you learned from your peers’ posts and how you will be able to apply that knowledge to patient care. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. Posting to the Discussion Forum Select Add a new discussion topic. In the subject line of your post, type the chapter number and the title of your topic (i.e. Chapter 20: XXXX topic). Create your post. Select Post to Forum. Thank you for an amazing discussion post; I found it to be remarkably interesting. The purpose of this reply post is to reveal two key concepts from your research discussion and explain how I can use that knowledge in future practice as an AGACNP. As a mother of four children, I thought I knew all there was to know about amniocentesis. After reading your discussion post and article, there is more to learn. The first key concept I learned is that amniocentesis, that the following was an indication for a referral for amniocentesis, mothers age,  gestational age based on the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP), body mass index (BMI), mother’s blood group, underlying diseases and medical records in previous pregnancies (Tara et al., 2016). I was unaware that body mass index played a role in referring for an amniocentesis. The second key concept I learned from your discussion post and article is that amniotic fluid leakage starts from 24 to 72 hours after amniocentesis and stops during the one-week follow visit (Tara et al., 2016). It surprises me to know how quickly the amniotic fluid can start leaking and that spotting starts at the same time as well. In a study by Thomas (2019), an ounce of amniotic fluid is usually needed. About 80% of women have two attempts of the amniocentesis procedure to get enough fluid for testing. Meaning the syringe attached to the needle is inserted twice, which could bring out those women at higher risk for leakage. As a future AGACNP, I may find myself caring for a woman with amniotic fluid leakage and blood spotting after an amniocentesis if she was to present at urgent care or emergency room. Many patients feel sicker at night, and her OBGYN would be closed, and she would be referred to the nearest emergency room for evaluation. I would then perform a pelvic examination, place her on a fetal monitor, and perform blood work to assess for spontaneous abortion. Thank you for a highly informative post. The part of these discussion posts I like the most is reading about all the different disorders and learning from them. Best Regards, Teresa H. Resources: Tara, F., Lotfalizadeh, M., & Moeindarbari, S. (2016). The effect of diagnostic amniocentesis and its complications on early spontaneous abortion. Electronic physician, 8(8), 2787–2792. https://doi.org/10.19082/2787 Thomas, L. (2019). Amniocentesis Procedure. News Medical Life Science https://www.news-medical.net/health/Amniocentesis-Procedure.aspx Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 660 Week 13 Discussion 1: Research Article Critique Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric. Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range. (example: 17-0 points) Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points Criteria Exemplary Exceeds Expectations Advanced Meets Expectations Intermediate Needs Improvement Novice Inadequate Total Points Quality of Initial Post Provides clear examples supported by course content and references. Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials. All instruction requirements noted. 40 points Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints. Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions. Cites two references. 35 points Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development. Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions. Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content. Most instruction requirements are noted. 31 points Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. No references cited. Missing several instruction requirements. Submits post late. 27 points 40 Peer Response Post Offers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation. All instruction requirements noted. 40 points Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post. Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post. All instruction requirements noted. 35 points Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight. Missing reference from one peer post. Partially followed instructions regarding number of reply posts. Most instruction requirements are noted. 31 points Post is primarily a summation of peer’s post without further synthesis of course content. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Did not follow instructions regarding number of reply posts. Missing reference from peer posts. Missing several instruction requirements. Submits post late. 27 points 40 Frequency of Distribution Initial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days. All instruction requirements noted. 10 points Initial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days. 8 points Minimum of two post options (initial and/or peer) made on separate days. 7 points All posts made on same day. Submission demonstrates inadequate preparation. No post submitted. 6 points 10 Organization Well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise with a logical flow of ideas. 5 points Organized content with an informative purpose statement, supportive content, and summary statement. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow. 4 points Poor organization and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work. Purpose statement is noted. 3 points Illogical flow of ideas. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. No purpose statement. Submits assignment late. 2 points 5 APA, Grammar, and Spelling Correct APA formatting with no errors. The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 5 points Correct and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used. No more than two unique APA errors. The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability. There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 4 points Three to four unique APA formatting errors. The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors. 3 points Five or more unique formatting errors or no attempt to format in APA. The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. Submits assignment late. 2 points 5 Total Points 100 Order Now