(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment Assessment Description This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation: A description of each quality model. A brief history of each quality model. A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting. Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence. Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Resources Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Read Chapter 5 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. View Resource Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program Read “Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program,” by Lavin and Vet … Read More https://oce-ovid-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/article/00001786-900000000-99307/PDF Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable Read “Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable,” from Same-Day Surgery (2020). … Read More https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/2507126753?accountid=7374 Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement Read “Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement,” from the Practice Facilitation Handbook (2013), located on the Agenc … Read More https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/system/pfhandbook/mod4.html Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care Read Chapter 5 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care. View Resource Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach Read “Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach,” by Godley and Jenkins, from Jour … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.or CLC – Quality Models – Rubric Collapse All CLC – Quality Models – RubricCollapse All Description of Each Model 12 points Criteria Description Description of Each Model 5. Target 12 points A description of each quality model is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 11.04 points A description of each quality model is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 10.56 points A description of each quality model is present. 2. Insufficient 9.6 points A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of each quality model is not present. Brief History of Each Model 13 points Criteria Description Brief History of Each Model 5. Target 13 points A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 11.96 points A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 11.44 points A brief history of each quality model is present. 2. Insufficient 10.4 points A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A brief history of each quality model is not present. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting 15 points Criteria Description A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting 5. Target 15 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.8 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 13.2 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present. 2. Insufficient 12 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is not present. Presentation of Content 30 points Criteria Description Presentation of Content 5. Target 30 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Acceptable 27.6 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. 3. Approaching 26.4 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. 2. Insufficient 24 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Layout 10 points Criteria Description Layout 5. Target 10 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. 4. Acceptable 9.2 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. 3. Approaching 8.8 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. 2. Insufficient 8 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Language Use and Audience Awareness 10 points Criteria Description Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc. 5. Target 10 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. 4. Acceptable 9.2 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. 3. Approaching 8.8 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. 2. Insufficient 8 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Mechanics of Writing 5 points Criteria Description Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use 5. Target 5 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. 4. Acceptable 4.6 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. 3. Approaching 4.4 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. 2. Insufficient 4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Documentation of Sources 5 points Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Target 5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. Acceptable 4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. Approaching 4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. Insufficient 4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Order Now