(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment Assessment Description The purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay: A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety. Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety. An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture. An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether the organizations are Christian or not. Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture. This assignment requires a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Topic 2 DQ 1 Feb 17–19, 2022 Using the AHRQ SOPS Surveys webpage, provided in the topic Resources, select the SOPS survey appropriate for the practice setting in which you work. Complete the survey at your site and discuss how your facility scored. What changes would you recommend based on the survey results? Replies to Ramona Chatman Based on the safety survey for the patient safety regarding the hospital setting for my unit which is the cath Lab. The Cath lab has areas of opportunity for improvement the area of communication patient safety. It seems that the patients are well cared for to prevent NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment an emergency. Such as having defibrillator pads on every heart cath patient. What is lacing is the communication about any near events for events that happening to prevent them from happening again. While patient satisfaction is paramount, staff satisfaction is also a high priority. Nurses who felt like they weren’t constantly aware of policy or unit changes received lower rankings, according to the poll. Changes that are need is a formal process to communicate events that are near miss or occurred. Conducting brief, open meetings of the cath lab promptly after complex procedures are completed or when complications occur. Discuss what went right during the procedure and what could be improved upon. Most importantly, debriefings allow the staff to have the opportunity to safely speak out about their concerns in an environment where it will not distract from patient care. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2022). Surveys on patient safety culture. https://www.ahrq.gov/sops/about/index.html Hmpgloballearningnetwork.com. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2022, from https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/cathlab/article/Patient-Safety-Cath-Lab-Take-Time-Out-Part-I-III Resources Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture Read “Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture,” by Pearson, from … Read More https://oce-ovid-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/article/00005110-202003000-00007/HTML A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns Read “A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns,” by Stucky, De Jong, Kabo, and Kasper, from AORN  … Read More https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/2413010983?accountid=7374 Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Read Chapter 12 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. View Resource Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care Read Chapters 2 and 9 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care. Optional: For add … Read More View Resource Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment Read “Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment,” by Fencl, Willoughby, and Jackson, from … Read More https://oce-ovid-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/article/00000703-202104000-00003/HTML Flag the Play: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety Read “‘Flag the Play’: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety,” by Hollinger, from Nursing Management (2019). … Read More https://oce-ovid-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/article/00006247-201907000-00003/HTML Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement Read “Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement,” by Bliss, Chambers, and Rambur, from Nursin … Read More https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/2437192701/2571F5F30BDC4F29PQ/1?accountid=7374 Just Culture Read “Just Culture,” by Ungvarsky, from Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health (2020). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=119214258&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1 Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University Read “Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University,” located on the Grand Canyon University website. Use th … Read More https://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/IFLW.pdf SOPS Surveys Review the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (SOPS) surveys provided on the SOPS Surveys page of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Q … Read More https://www.ahrq.gov/sops Health Care Culture – Rubric Collapse All Health Care Culture – RubricCollapse All Definition of Health Care Culture 11 points Criteria Description Definition of Health Care Culture 5. Target 11 points A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 10.12 points A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 9.68 points A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present. 2. Insufficient 8.8 points A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A definition of health care culture is not present. Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety 12 points Criteria Description Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety 5. Target 12 points Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate. 4. Acceptable 11.04 points Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate. 3. Approaching 10.56 points Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present. Some examples are appropriate. 2. Insufficient 9.6 points Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are not present. Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture 12 points Criteria Description Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture 5. Target 12 points An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 11.04 points An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 10.56 points An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present. 2. Insufficient 9.6 points An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is not present. Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used 12 points Criteria Description Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to Improve Their Ethical Practices 5. Target 12 points An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 11.04 points An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and detailed. 3. Approaching 10.56 points An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present. 2. Insufficient 9.6 points An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is not present. Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work 12 points Criteria Description Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture 5. Target 12 points Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and thorough. 4. Acceptable 11.04 points Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and detailed. 3. Approaching 10.56 points Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present. 2. Insufficient 9.6 points Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but lack details or are incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are not present. Scholarly Sources 11 points Criteria Description Scholarly Sources 5. Target 11 points A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. 4. Acceptable 10.12 points A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. 3. Approaching 9.68 points A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. 2. Insufficient 8.8 points Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present. Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7 points Criteria Description Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. 5. Target 7 points The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. 4. Acceptable 6.44 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. 3. Approaching 6.16 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. 2. Insufficient 5.6 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8 points Criteria Description Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. 5. Target 8 points The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 4. Acceptable 7.36 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 3. Approaching 7.04 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 2. Insufficient 6.4 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. Evidence 5 points Criteria Description Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. 5. Target 5 points Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively. 4. Acceptable 4.6 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated. 3. Approaching 4.4 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. 2. Insufficient 4 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. Mechanics of Writing 5 points Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Target 5 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Acceptable 4.6 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Approaching 4.4 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Insufficient 4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Format/Documentation 5 points Criteria Description Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., 5. Target 5 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. 4. Acceptable 4.6 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. 3. Approaching 4.4 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. 2. Insufficient 4 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. Total 100 points Order Now