(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NUR 630 Week 6 Assignment Quality Data Sources NUR 630 Week 6 Assignment Quality Data Sources NUR 630 Week 6 Assignment Quality Data Sources Assessment Description The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with various data sources used by health care organizations to obtain quality data. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) creates an annual report, the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report, which assesses the performance of the U.S. health care system. This report identifies strengths and weaknesses of the health care system in addition to disparities for access to health care and quality of health care. The report is based on more than 250 measures of quality and disparities, and it covers a broad range of health care services and settings. Access the most current report using the “National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports” AHRQ website, provided in the topic Resources. Select five data sources from this report and fill in the required components on the “Quality Data Sources Organizer.” While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Attachments NUR-630-RS-QualityDataSourcesOrganizer Resources Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports Review the most current “National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report” provided on the National Healthcare Quality and … Read More https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/index.html Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Review Chapter 4 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. View Resource Analysis of Secondary Data Read “Analysis of Secondary Data,” by Wienclaw, from Salem Press Encyclopedia (2021). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=89185341&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1 Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice Read “Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice,” by Blackmore, Leonard, Madayag, an … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137056439&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost The Use of Data Collected From mHealth Apps to Inform Evidence‐Based Quality Improvement: An Integrative Review Read “The Use of Data Collected From mHealth Apps to Inform Evidence‐Based Quality Improvement: An Integrative Review,” by … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134685673&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost TJC: Quality Improvement Should Include Data Analysis on Equitable Care Read “TJC: Quality Improvement Should Include Data Analysis on Equitable Care,” by Even, from Hospital Peer Review (2021 … Read More https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/2536481470?accountid=7374 Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care NUR 630 Week 6 Assignment Quality Data Sources Review Chapters 2 and 4 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 630 Week 6 Assignment Quality Data Sources View Resource Data Management for Quality Improvement: How to Collect and Manage Data Read “Data Management for Quality Improvement: How to Collect and Manage Data,” by Au, Murray, and Granger, from AACN Advance … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=150698797&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost Toolkit for Best Practice Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Quality Improvement Read “Toolkit for Best Practice Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Quality Improvement,” by Omary, Cox-Henley, Hertzberg, … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=h Quality Data Sources – Rubric Collapse All Quality Data Sources – RubricCollapse All Data Source 1 14.4 points Criteria Description Data Source 1 5. Target 14.4 points The required criteria for data source 1 are thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.25 points The required criteria for data source 1 are detailed. 3. Approaching 12.67 points The required criteria for data source 1 are present. 2. Insufficient 11.52 points The required criteria for data source 1 are present but lack detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The required criteria for data source 1 are not present. Data Source 2 14.4 points Criteria Description Data Source 2 5. Target 14.4 points The required criteria for data source 2 are thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.25 points The required criteria for data source 2 are detailed. 3. Approaching 12.67 points The required criteria for data source 2 are present. 2. Insufficient 11.52 points The required criteria for data source 2 are present but lack detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The required criteria for data source 2 are not present. Data Source 3 14.4 points Criteria Description Data Source 3 5. Target 14.4 points The required criteria for data source 3 are thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.25 points The required criteria for data source 3 are detailed. 3. Approaching 12.67 points The required criteria for data source 3 are present. 2. Insufficient 11.52 points The required criteria for data source 3 are present but lack detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The required criteria for data source 3 are not present. Data Source 4 14.4 points Criteria Description Data Source 4 5. Target 14.4 points The required criteria for data source 4 are thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.25 points The required criteria for data source 4 are detailed. 3. Approaching 12.67 points The required criteria for data source 4 are present. 2. Insufficient 11.52 points The required criteria for data source 4 are present but lack detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The required criteria for data source 4 are not present. Data Source 5 14.4 points Criteria Description Data Source 5 5. Target 14.4 points The required criteria for data source 5 are thorough. 4. Acceptable 13.25 points The required criteria for data source 5 are detailed. 3. Approaching 12.67 points The required criteria for data source 5 are present. 2. Insufficient 11.52 points The required criteria for data source 5 are present but lack detail or is incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The required criteria for data source 5 are not present. Mechanics of Writing 4 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Target 4 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Acceptable 3.68 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Approaching 3.52 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Insufficient 3.2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Format/Documentation 4 points Criteria Description Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., 5. Target 4 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. 4. Acceptable 3.68 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. 3. Approaching 3.52 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. 2. Insufficient 3.2 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. Total 80 points Order Now