(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay Assessment Description Applying a model or framework for change ensures that a process is in place to guide the efforts for change. In 500-750 words, discuss the model or framework you will use to implement your evidence-based practice proposal project. You will use the model or framework you select in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Include the following: Identify the selected model or framework for change and discuss its relevance to your project. Discuss each of the stages in the change model/framework. Describe how you would apply each stage of the model or theoretical framework in your proposed implementation. Create a concept map for the conceptual model or framework you selected to illustrate how it will be applied to your project. Attach this as an appendix at the end of your paper. Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay You are required to cite minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Benchmark Information This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing 1.2 Apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level. Resources Collapse All Guidelines and Measures Study “Guidelines and Measures,” located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html Study Designs Review “Study Designs,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/study-designs Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence Read “Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence,” by the University of Illinois/Chicago’s Library of the Health Sciences at Peo … Read More http://researchguides.uic.edu/content.php?pid=232200&sid=1921074 Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Investigate the Nursing Best Practice Guidelines page of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) website. http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=861&SiteNodeID=133 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change – Rubric Collapse All Selected Model or Framework for Change 12 points Criteria Description Selected Model or Framework for Change 5. 5: Excellent 12 points The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are thoroughly discussed. Rationale or support is provided. 4. 4: Good 11.04 points The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.56 points The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are incomplete. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.6 points The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are summarized. More information or support is needed. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are not discussed. Stages for Model or Framework 13 points Criteria Description Stages for Model or Framework 5. 5: Excellent 13 points The stages in the change model or framework are outlined. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed. 4. 4: Good 11.96 points The stages in the change model or framework are thoroughly discussed. 3. 3: Satisfactory 11.44 points The stages in the change model or framework are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 10.4 points The stages in the change model or framework are not discussed. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The stages in the change model or framework are only partially discussed. Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation 15 points Criteria Description Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation 5. 5: Excellent 15 points Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is thoroughly described. 4. 4: Good 13.8 points General application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is outlined. More information is needed. Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change 3. 3: Satisfactory 13.2 points Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 12 points Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is incomplete. NUR 590 Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is omitted. Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Concept Map for Model or Framework 15 points Criteria Description Concept Map for Model or Framework 5. 5: Excellent 15 points A detailed and accurate concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. 4. 4: Good 13.8 points A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. 3. 3: Satisfactory 13.2 points A general concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. There are inaccuracies. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 12 points The concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is incomplete or inaccurate. The concept map is attached, but not in the Appendix. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is omitted. Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (B) 10 points Criteria Description Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (C.1.2) 5. 5: Excellent 10 points The author has clearly demonstrated the ability to effectively apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level. 4. 4: Good 9.2 points The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is adequately demonstrated. 3. 3: Satisfactory 8.8 points The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is generally demonstrated. There are some gaps or inaccuracies. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8 points The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not consistently demonstrated. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not demonstrated. Required Sources 5 points Criteria Description Required Sources 5. 5: Excellent 5 points Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. 4. 4: Good 4.6 points Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.4 points Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4 points Sources are not included. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis Development and Purpose 7 points Criteria Description Thesis Development and Purpose 5. 5: Excellent 7 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change 4. 4: Good 6.44 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 3. 3: Satisfactory 6.16 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 5.6 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Argument Logic and Construction 8 points Criteria Description Argument Logic and Construction 5. 5: Excellent 8 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 4. 4: Good 7.36 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 3. 3: Satisfactory 7.04 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.4 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. 5: Excellent 5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. 4: Good 4.6 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.4 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5 points Criteria Description Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5. 5: Excellent 5 points All format elements are correct. 4. 4: Good 4.6 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.4 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Documentation of Sources 5 points Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. 5: Excellent 5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. 4: Good 4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Resources Collapse All Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice Read Chapter 14 and review Chapter15 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. View Resource Critical Appraisal Tools Read “Critical Appraisal Tools,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines Study “Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines,” from the “Evidence Based Medicine Toolkit,” by Buckingham, Fisher, and Saunders (2 … Read More http://www.ebm.med.ualberta.ca/CPGWorksheet.html Guidelines and Measures Study “Guidelines and Measures,” located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Investigate the Nursing Best Practice Guidelines page of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) website. http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=861&SiteNodeID=133 Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence Read “Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence,” by the University of Illinois/Chicago’s Library of the Health Sciences at Peoria (2021) … Read More http://researchguides.uic.edu/content.php?pid=232200&sid=1921074 Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Survey Results Read “Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Survey Result … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142632269&site=ehost-live&scope=site Star Model Explore the Star Model resources, located on the UT Health San Antonio School of Nursing website. https://www.uthscsa.edu/academics/nursing/star-model Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession Read Chapter 6 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession. View Resource Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice Read “Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice,” by Stetler, by Nursing Outlook (2 … Read More https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0029655401478390 Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation Read “Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation,” by Buckwalter et al., from Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123692132&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes Read “A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes,” by Melnyk, Fi … Read More https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=121082056&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost Study Designs Review “Study Designs,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/ Order Now