(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NU 631 Week 5 Discussion 1: Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Regis NU 631 Week 5 Discussion 1 Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Regis NU 631 Week 5 Discussion 1: Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Regis Week 5 Discussion 1: Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Value: Complete at 100 points/Incomplete at 0 points Due: Create your initial post by Day 3, and reply to at least two of your peers by Day 7. Grading Category: Discussions Initial Post One group member from each group submits their Word document containing the website/URL for their presentation by Day 3. Additionally, one group member should submit the same Word document containing their website/URL for their presentation to Week 5 Assignment 1: Methods for Scientific Inquiry Presentation Group Project by Day 3. After your recording is complete, follow these instructions to create an unlisted YouTube video. You will need the YouTube video URL for this discussion. Submit your YouTube video URL. The best way to do this is to copy and paste the hyperlink URL for the YouTube video into a Word document. Your faculty and peers will access your video via the link so make certain to make it unlisted and not private so others can access it. Do not upload a video file (mp4). Replies You will respond individually to two group presentations by using references and addressing the following: Although you may have more than one question after viewing the groups’ presentations, you will identify one question you have for each of the two presentations and then find an article in the Regis library or Google Scholar that uses each of the two group’s research method (a different research article from what that group included in their presentation) and briefly summarize how it incorporates that research method. Describe the question and how you went about answering it, i.e., where you found the answer. Provide the complete APA reference for the articles in both of your replies, as well as use proper APA citations. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. The described expectations meet the passing level of 80%. Students are directed to review the Discussion Grading Rubric for criteria which exceed expectations. Posting to the Discussion Forum Select the appropriate Thread. Select Reply. Create your post. Select Post to Forum. GROUP 2 I chose the article Teacher Questioning Behavior found in the Review of Educational Research. This study was a meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questing behavior. The study consisted of 20 studies selected for review. Each study looked at the effect of teacher questioning techniques and student success. They used two kinds of study training experiments and skill experiments. Teaching skill was the independent variable where achievement was the dependent variable. Experimental studies have three main characteristics: a controlled manipulation of a least one treatment variable (independent variable), administration of the treatment (experimental group)…and not a control group, random selection treatment group and a control group (Shadish et al., 2002). One question I thought about when learning about experimental research was If you simply act on one variable (group) and not the other group of variable then is that simply experimental research? I would have to say yes in theory. As long as there is an experimental group, control group, and independent variable I would agree that it would fall under experimental research. I refered to our text book for this information. References Gray, J., & Grove, S. K. (2021). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier. Shadish, S. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized casual inference. Boston, Ma: Houghton Mifflin Company. Hello group 2. Good information on your post and presentation about experimental research. Experimental research is important in nursing as it seeks to provide evidence-based practice sciences. Experimental research has no subject limitations, and it can be done in a laboratory, in a field or in an environment. The center of experimental research is validity, producing true evidence (Ojmarrh Mitchell,2015). The concern of in experimental research is to find out the cause and effects of 2 variables. First variable in an experimental research is to determine the cause and effect of variables. The second criterion in an experimental research is to determine if the cause variable occur before the effect variation. The third variation is the hardest the researcher must make sure not to omit or unmeasured any variables during the experiment. e there are usually many, many potentially relevant third variables and many of these third variables are unobserved, the criterion of nonspuriousness can be quite difficult to achieve (Ojmarrh Mitchell,2015). NU 631 Week 5 Discussion 1 Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Regis Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NU 631 Week 5 Discussion 1: Methods for Scientific Inquiry Peer Review Regis References Experimental Research Design – Mitchell – – Major Reference Works – Wiley Online Library Berk, R. A., & Rauma, D. (1983). Capitalizing on nonrandom assignment to treatments: A regression discontinuity evaluation of a crime-control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 21–27. GROPU 4 Hi Jessica and Emily, Thank you for the great presentation. One question I had regarding case study research is regarding the data collection. As it was described this is qualitative research, I am wondering what kind of data collection is done when performing a case study? According to Gray and Grove (2020) case study using qualitative data would include interviews, document reviews, participant observation, and even focus groups. Interestingly enough case studies can include quantitative or qualitative data or both (Gray and Grove, 2020). One article I found that uses a case study research is by Finerup et al. (2021). This case study explored the best practices of patients who had chronic kidney disease for research involvement. Finerup et al. (2021) used document analysis and semistructured individual interviews for the data collection and then found important facilitators for the patients in this group. They concluded that there needs to be active involvement with the participants that allows them to feel as if they working as a team, being a part of the process, and being prepared for the work was also a key factor. As part of my question discussed previously in this article the data were collected using semistructured interviews and also document analysis which included evaluations, audio recordings, publications, and PowerPoints. References Finderup, J., Crowley, A., Søndergaard, H., & Lomborg, K. (2021). Involvement of patients with chronic kidney disease in research: A case study. Journal of Renal Care, 47(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12346 Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Hi Jessica and Emily, Thank you for the presentation on case studies. One question after watching the presentation is if case studies can also be a quantitative study? According to Gray & Grove (2020), case studies are frequently used in qualitative research, but does not exclude quantitative research. To answer this question would be to search the databases to see if any case study utilized quantitative properties. One research article found was regarding the use of E-cigarettes and who were mostly using them. The researcher created an online survey to collect data on E-cigarette usage and compared the numbers to another online dataset (Zhan et al., 2019). This use of survey can be either qualitative or quantitative depending on the type of survey. This was what I have learned after doing the presentation on survey research (Ponto, 2015). With this study found, numerical data were collected and compared making it a quantitative case study. References Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Ponto J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 6(2), 168–171. Zhan, Y., Etter, J.-F., Leischow, S., & Zeng, D. (2019). Electronic cigarette usage patterns: a case study combining survey and social media data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 26(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy140 GROUP 1 Hi group 1 thank you for your presentation on survey research. I had never considered this type of research to stand-alone itself, rather I always thought of it as a type of qualitative data collection. However, after watching your presentation I realize that it is really a mixed-methods sort of design because quantitative data can also be collected. One of the questions I had about survey design was, does survey research design fall victim to participants wanting to answer in a socially acceptable/biased way? Spekle & Widener (2018) state that although this is a limitation with this type of research, including larger sample size and phrasing questions in specific ways can help reduce response bias. A recent article I found that utilizes a survey research design is, “How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19?” (Bartik et al., 2020). This utilizes the survey research design because it surveyed 5,800 small businesses across the United States. The survey consisted of 43 questions that provided both qualitative and quantitative data. The survey collected demographic information about the businesses as well as open-ended questions about themes the researchers were exploring. In the end, the researchers were able to draw conclusions about the themes under study (Bartik et al., 2020). This study also helped answer my question about bias because since so many businesses were surveyed and they were diverse in size and location, there was a large reduction in potential bias. The interesting part about this research study is that it used the survey method to gather early information about businesses adjusting to COVID-19 which then allows them to return at a later date and possibly compare data to see how things have changed or stayed the same. This is a great example of how survey research is useful in gathering information over periods of time. References Bartik, A., Bertrand, M., Cullen, Z., Glaeser, E., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. (2020). How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey. National Bureau of Economic Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3386/w26989 Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2017). Challenging Issues in Survey Research: Discussion and Suggestions. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51860 Great job group 1 on reviewing survey research. Most importantly, this type of research allows for the opinions of the people that the study impacts. For example, in the survey research, I found by Gilsenan et al. (2021) the survey research targeted the population of the geriatric community as they attended appointment-based specialized geriatric services (SGS). They found that this was important as many survey research limited relevance to frail and medically complex older adults (Gilsenan et al., 2021). This survey research was in fact conducted collaboratively with older adults which included the patient, family, and friends. Ultimately they used 12 core items, two global rating items, two open-ended questions, and two demographic questions which allowed them to note that improvements can be made in the clinical experience and quality of care of older adults(Gilsenan et al., 2021). One question I had was how biases can be eliminated when conducting research. Specifically, can the researcher have biased survey research in choosing who to interview? As noted by Grey and Grove (2020), in survey research addition, a researcher cannot exclude a subset of people from selection as subjects because he or she does not agree with them, does not like them, or finds them hard to deal with and also subjects cannot be excluded just because they are too sick, not sick enough, coping too well, or not coping adequately. This was helpful in understanding specifically how the sample was chosen in terms of eliminating any biases. References: Gilsenan, R., Schwartz, R., Gutmanis, I. A., Day, A. M. B., Ryan, D. P., Brander, R. R. A., Milne, K., & Molnar, F. (2021). Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 24(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.487 Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.   Order Now