(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 2: What’s Your Research Question? Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 2 What’s Your Research Question? Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 2: What’s Your Research Question? Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) Pressure Ulcers. Pressure ulcers are an ongoing problem in health care. The gravely ill, immobile and elderly patients are most affected. Pressure ulcers are localized injuries to the skin and tissue mainly caused by applying pressure to one area for a prolonged period of time. A study classified incident cases in severity as; 55 percent in category I and 42.6 percent were category in terms of severity of Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPU) (Caro and Heras, 2020). Most of the pressure ulcers are either acquired from hospitals during short stays or in long term facilities. Pressure ulcers have been an ongoing problem especially in patients in hospitals and nursing homes. From experience I have met patients that I personally admitted and had done skin assessments on, only to find out a few days later that they had pressure ulcers. Therefore, my interest is to figure out why they are getting those ulcers to begin with. There are many factors to consider for the causes such as health conditions like Diabetes which can impede healing, mobility-is the patient able to move around independently. A patient’s mobility status also determines whether they will get ulcers or not. Are the nursing staff repositioning these patients? All these factors need to be closely looked into as causatives of this problem.  Research also has to be done on what interventions can be implemented to prevent these ulcers from worsening, steps like repositions, looking at patient lab results and following up on how to treat accordingly, what assessments can be used to determine who is more at risk to getting pressure ulcers. More research needs to be done on why pressure ulcers continue to be a problem (Borojeny et al.,2021). In this advance era, there should be no cases of HAPU or incidents in nursing homes. However, pressure ulcers are one of the nosocomial infections that continue to affect our patients. There are implementations in place such as repositioning in place, but I think more research has to be done, to come up with better ways of fighting this problem. Afzali Borojeny L;Albatineh AN;Hasanpour Dehkordi A;Ghanei Gheshlagh R; (2020, October 5). The Incidence of Pressure Ulcers and its Associations in Different Wards of the Hospital: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International journal of preventive medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33312480/. Caro, I. D., & Heras, S. G. G. (2020, January 8). Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in patients with “minimal risk” according to the “Norton-MI” scale. PloS one. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31914154/.   Type your Research Topic To determine the value nurses place on pressure ulcer prevention Type your Research Problem Increase in pressure ulcers in healthcare facilities Type your Research Purpose To determine what value nurse place in pressure ulcer prevention Type at Least Three Research Objectives/Aims identify what causes pressure ulcers 2. Determine who is at risk to get pressure ulcers 3. How to prevent pressure ulcers from occurring. Type One or Two Research Questions How do we prevent pressure ulcers from occurring. Type Your Hypotheses (One or Two) for Each of Your Research Questions Repositioning patients every two hours while in bed will prevent pressure ulcers.   Week 4 Assignment 2: What’s Your Research Question? Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) Value: 100 points Due: Day 7 Grading Category: Assignments Instructions Based on your preliminary investigation of the literature and your discussion with the expert clinician, complete the following on a Word document: Submit a 350-word summary of your clinical research area of interest and explain why you are interested in it. Ensure you present your research questions that you started working on in Let’s Get Started on Research Concepts. You will now have more information from your expert clinician, as well as feedback from your instructor. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. To Submit Your Assignment: Select the Add Submissions button. Drag or upload your file to the File Picker. Select Save Changes. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 2: What’s Your Research Question? Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) Submission status Writing Assignment Rubric Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric. Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points Criteria Exemplary Exceeds Expectations Advanced Meets Expectations Intermediate Needs Improvement Novice Inadequate Total Points Content of Paper The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials. All instruction requirements noted. 30 points The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. All instruction requirements noted. 26 points The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of the paper being summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Only uses scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials. Most instruction requirements are noted. 23 points Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Use of course content is superficial. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Content of paper is inaccurately portrayed or missing. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Does not use scholarly resources. Missing some instruction requirements. 20 points 30 Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning Through critical analysis, the submitted paper provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content. Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints. All instruction requirements noted. 30 points Paper is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources. Information is synthesized to help fulfill paper requirements. The content supports at least one viewpoint. All instruction requirements noted. 26 points Paper lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding any new information or insight. The paper’s content may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete. Most instruction requirements are noted. 23 points Submission is primarily a summation of the assignment without further synthesis of course content or analysis of the scenario. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Missing some instruction requirements. Submits assignment late. 20 points 30 Application of Knowledge The summary of the paper provides information validated via scholarly resources that offer a multidisciplinary approach. The student’s application in practice is accurate and plausible, and additional scholarly resource(s) supporting the application is provided. All questions posed within the assignment are answered in a well-developed manner with citations for validation. All instruction requirements noted. 30 points A summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained from the assignment is presented. Student indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice. All instruction requirements noted. 26 points Objective criteria are not clearly used, allowing for a more superficial application of content between the assignment and the broader course content. Student’s indication of how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice is vague. Most instruction requirements are noted. 23 points The application of knowledge is significantly lacking. Student’s indication of how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice is not practical or feasible. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Application of knowledge is incorrect and/or student fails to explain how the information will be used within their personal practice. Missing several instruction requirements. Submits assignment late. 20 points 30 Organization Well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise with a logical flow of ideas. 5 points Organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow. 4 points Poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work. Purpose statement is noted. 3 points Illogical flow of ideas. Missing significant content. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. No purpose statement. Submits assignment late. 2 points 5 APA, Grammar, and Spelling Correct APA formatting with no errors. The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 5 points Correct and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used. No more than two unique APA errors. The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability. There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 4 points Three to four unique APA formatting errors. The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors. 3 points Five or more unique formatting errors or no attempt to format in APA. The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. Submits assignment late. 2 points 5 Total Points 100   Order Now