(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

NRS 433 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement NRS 433 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement NRS 433 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Assessment Description Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below. PICOT Question  Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor. The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions. The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question. Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes. General Requirements You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Attachments NRS-433V-RS5-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuidelines.docxNRS-433V-RS5-Research-Critique-PICO Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft – Rubric Criteria Description Evidence of Revision 5. 5: Excellent 26 points Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Criteria Description Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question 5. 5: Excellent 13 points PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included. Criteria Description Background of Studies 5. 5: Excellent 13 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Criteria Description Method of Studies 5. 5: Excellent 13 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete. Criteria Description Results of Studies 5. 5: Excellent 13 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Criteria Description Ethical Considerations 5. 5: Excellent NRS 433 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRS 433 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement 13 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete. Criteria Description Conclusion 5. 5: Excellent 13 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Criteria Description PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship 5. 5: Excellent 26 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included. Criteria Description Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change 5. 5: Excellent 26 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. Criteria Description Thesis Development and Purpose 5. 5: Excellent 26 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Criteria Description Argument Logic and Construction 5. 5: Excellent 26 points Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. 5: Excellent 26 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. 4: Good 24.44 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 3. 3: Satisfactory 21.58 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 19.5 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Criteria Description Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5. 5: Excellent 13 points All format elements are correct. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. 5: Excellent 13 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. 4: Good 12.22 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. 3: Satisfactory 10.79 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9.75 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Total 260 points Order Now