(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

IYM1 TASK 2: HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF SCHOLARLY SOURCES IYM1 TASK 2: HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF SCHOLARLY SOURCES IYM1 TASK 2: HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF SCHOLARLY SOURCES 7073.2.3 : Project Management Lifecycle The graduate describes the four phases of the project management lifecycle that will guide their healthcare improvement project successfully from initiation to closure. 7073.2.4 : Initiating the Project The graduate synthesizes relevant research, feasibility results, patient preferences, and interdisciplinary stakeholder perspectives to initiate a healthcare improvement project. INTRODUCTION Note: You must have completed and passed D156 Task 1: Healthcare Improvement Project Phase 1: Project Initiation and Clinical Practice Experiences (CPE) prior to beginning this task. After this first course in the program, the remaining specialty courses through your capstone course will each have a summative assessment that consists of an authentic performance assessment. Together, the courses scaffold the tasks of your healthcare improvement project (HIP) through the project management lifecycle phases: project initiation, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Each performance assessment will focus on aspects of the proposal you will develop for a healthcare improvement project using a real-world approach to improving healthcare. Each phase will be described in different sections of a Healthcare Improvement Project (HIP) paper. While completing your Business Case Analysis for a Healthcare Improvement course, you collaborated with your proposal team members, specialized experts in your field of interest, or colleagues from your current or former organization to assess the need for and feasibility of implementing your project using a project management approach. This required the completion of several different analytic methods that support your recommendation for a healthcare improvement project (HIP). In this task, you will begin to write your scholarly HIP paper that will place your proposed HIP in the context of the literature and provide evidence to support your project. In the introduction section of your paper, you should synthesize a select few key articles to provide the context, the problem or opportunity, and the purpose for your project. In the next section, you will provide a review of scholarly, peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years that are relevant and credible to your HIP. A well-written review of the literature compares and contrasts published sources, highlights exemplary studies, identifies gaps in knowledge, and indicates how your project will fill the gap and advance nursing practice. This task requires the submission of your entire HIP paper template including the following section(s) of your HIP paper which you will be developing in this performance assessment: •   Introduction” •   Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources” The following template should be completed and submitted as an appendix to your HIP paper: •   Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template (Appendix A) REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Complete the Introduction and Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources sections of your healthcare improvement project (HIP) paper by doing the following: Introduction A.  Develop an introduction for your HIP paper by doing the following: 1.  Describe background information and set the project topic in the context of literature by using articles with similar projects, settings, or outcomes. 2.  Present the problem or opportunity that will be the focus of your project and explain the significance of your project to your target population, your organization, and your nursing practice using specific examples. Note: Use the problem or opportunity you identified in the Needs Assessment you completed for Task 1. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: IYM1 TASK 2: HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF SCHOLARLY SOURCES 3.  Write a statement of the purpose of your project that describes what the reader can expect. 4.  Analyze the four phases of the project management lifecycle in terms of your HIP by doing the following: a.  Describe one task you will need to complete during the HIP for each of the four phases. b.  Explain how the project management lifecycle will guide your project from initiation to closure, include examples from part A4a. Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources B.  Complete the Review of Scholarly Sources section of your HIP paper by doing the following: 1.  Explain the purpose and objectives of the scholarly source review in the context of your healthcare improvement project. 2.  Complete the attached “Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template” by searching for and selecting 5–10 scholarly sources published within the last five years, include the following for each of the sources identified: •   last name of the first author or the organization name •   publication year •   title of the source •   type of source •   explanation of how the scholarly source is similar and relevant to the proposed HIP 3.  Synthesize the five best sources from the “Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources” you completed in part B2 by critically evaluating the similarities and differences between the sources to identify themes and gaps that emerged from the evidence. C.  Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting into your paper: •   bias-free language •   objectivity, credibility of sources, and evidence-based approach •   APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective •   a title page and headers •   APA-specific formatting rules for in-text citations and references, margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page, main body, and appendices of your paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures D.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ' ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z RUBRIC A1:HIP BACKGROUND NOT EVIDENT A description of background information is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description provides background information that is not relevant to the candidate’s HIP, or the description does not set the project topic in the context of literature or does not provide specific examples of articles with similar projects, settings, or outcomes. COMPETENT The description provides background information relevant to the candidate’s HIP and sets the project topic in the context of literature by providing specific examples of articles with similar projects, settings, or outcomes. A2:PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY NOT EVIDENT The submission does not APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission presents the problem or opportunity that will be the focus COMPETENT The submission presents the problem or opportunity that will be present a problem or opportunity that will be the focus of the project. of the project but does not logically explain the significance of the project for the target population, the organization, or the nursing practice. The submission does not provide relevant examples to support the explanation of the problem or opportunity. the focus of the project and logically explains the significance of the project for the target population, the organization, and the nursing practice by providing relevant examples to support the explanation of the problem or opportunity. A3:STATEMENT OF PURPOSE NOT EVIDENT A statement of purpose for the paper is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The statement of purpose for the project is unclear or wordy or does not describe what the reader can expect to see in the project. COMPETENT The statement of purpose for the project is clear and concise and describes what the reader can expect to see in the project. A4A:PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFECYCLE NOT EVIDENT An analysis describing 1 task needed to complete the HIP for each of the four phases is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The analysis describes 1 task the candidate will need to complete during their HIP for each of the four phases, but 1 or more descriptions lack specificity, or 1 or more tasks do not logically align to its corresponding phase. COMPETENT The analysis describes 1 task the candidate will need to complete during their HIP for each of the four phases, and each description is specific and logically aligns to its corresponding phase. A4B:GUIDANCE FROM INITIATION TO CLOSURE NOT EVIDENT An explanation of how the four phases of the project management lifecycle will guide the healthcare improvement project from initiation to closure is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically address how the four phases of the project management lifecycle will guide the candidate’s healthcare improvement project from initiation to closure or the explanation is not supported with specific examples from part A4a. COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses how the four phases of the project management lifecycle will guide the candidate’s healthcare improvement project from initiation to closure using specific examples from part A4a to support the explanation. B1:PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF SCHOLARLY SOURCE REVIEW NOT EVIDENT An explanation of the purpose and objectives of the scholarly source review is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation addresses the purpose and objectives of the scholarly source review in the context of the candidate’s health improvement project, but the explanation is not logical or the purpose or objectives of the scholarly source review are not in the context of the candidate’s health improvement project. COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses the purpose and objectives of the scholarly source review in context of the candidate’s health improvement project. B2:TABLE OF RELEVANT SCHOLARLY SOURCES TEMPLATE NOT EVIDENT A submission does not provide the Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission provides a Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template that is missing 1 or more of the given elements for 1 or more sources. COMPETENT The submission provides a complete Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template with all the given elements addressed for each source. B3:SYNTHESIS OF SOURCES NOT EVIDENT A synthesis of the five best sources from the “Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources” is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not synthesize the five best sources from the “Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources” into one or more coherent paragraphs. Or the synthesis does not critically evaluate the similarities or differences between the sources or does not identify themes or gaps that emerged from the evidence. COMPETENT The submission synthesizes the five best sources from the “Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources” completed in part B2 into one or more coherent paragraphs. The synthesis critically evaluates the similarities and differences between the sources and identifies themes and gaps that emerged from the evidence. C:APA STYLE AND FORMAT NOT EVIDENT The submission does not incorporate the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not accurately or consistently incorporate 1 or more of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual. COMPETENT The submission accurately and consistently incorporates all of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual. D:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. unprofessional or distracts from the topic. is misused or ineffective. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS HIP Paper Template – Implementation Version_0321.docx HIP Paper Template – MCA Version_0321.docx Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template (Appendix A).docx Title of Healthcare Improvement Project Author Name (First, Middle Initial, Last) Western Governors University College of Health Profession Name of Instructor Month, Day, Year   Note: This document should be used as a template for your healthcare improvement project (HIP) academic paper. This paper should adhere to the formatting and style standards of the 7th edition of the APA style manual (American Psychological Association, 2020). Refer to the performance assessment tasks and rubrics for specific instructions on submitting each section of your HIP paper. D156: Business Case Analysis for Healthcare Improvement Task1: Assessment Stakeholder Identification Needs Assessment Impact Analysis and Template SWOT Analysis and Template SMART+C Goal and Outcome Statement and Template Task 2: Introduction for Health Improvement Project Problem Background Description of Problem Purpose Statement Project Management Lifecyle Project Guidance Initiation to Closure Scholarly Source Review Purpose Table of Scholarly Source Scholarly Source Synthesis   D157: Managing Resources in an Era of Disruption Human Resource Management Staffing Costs Project Team Member Engagement Recruitment Strategies Support for Team Members RACI Chart Financial Resource Management Budget Methods and Requirements Pro Forma Operating Budget Budget Variances Project Charter D158: Strategically Planning the Execution of a HIP Meetings and Organizational Policies Action Plan Development and Template SDOH and Target Population Force Field Analysis and Template Gantt Chart Information and Template Scope Statement Communication Management Plan D159: Evidenced Based Measures for Evaluating Healthcare Improvement Team Member Collaboration Data Elements Data Source KPI and Benchmarks Data Collection Method and Parameters Data Analysis Results Dissemination Plan Project Closure Plan L160: Nursing Leadership and Management Field Experience Task 1: Proposed Project Pre-Implementation Field Experience Agenda and Leadership Strategies Training Plan Validation of Training Plan Proposed Project Implementation and Control Field Experience Project Proposal Journal Project Management Strategy Project Status Reporting Methods   L161: Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure Evaluation of Process Key Lessons Final Data Analysis Project Considerations KPI Improving the Metrics Reflection Success and Challenges Project Team Contribution Issue Response Tracking KPI Project Closure Project Closure and Celebration Wrap Up Session Conclusion References Appendix A Impact Analysis (D156) Benefits: Identify two categories and at least two benefits for each of the categories that will be positively impacted by the implementation of your improvement project. Use a norms-based scale as a method of quantifying the impact the benefits will have. Give a “1” rating for low impact, a “2” rating for moderate impact, and a “3” rating for high impact. Total these benefit ratings and enter the sum in the “Total Benefits Score” cell. Category Improvement Project Benefits Rating       Order Now