(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

Health and Medical Questions Health and Medical Questions Health and Medical Questions Description   Utilize the attached template to develop a model case example that integrates physical and mental health and wellness care. Collaborative Care Assessment Template – RubricCollapse AllPatient Information50 pointsCriteria DescriptionIdentify the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment.5. Excellent50 pointsCase example expertly describes the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Case example demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.4. Good43.5 pointsCase example clearly describes the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment, and description is strong with sound analysis. Case example demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.3. Satisfactory39.5 pointsCase example adequately describes the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment, but description is limited. Case example demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.2. Less Than Satisfactory37 pointsCase example inadequately describes the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment, but description is weak. Case example demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsCase example omits or incompletely describes the chief complaint, initial physical exam, patient history, and safety assessment. Case example does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Standardized Assessment or Screening25 pointsCriteria DescriptionRecommend at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient.5. Excellent25 pointsCase example expertly describes at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Case example demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.4. Good21.75 pointsCase example clearly describes at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Case example demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.3. Satisfactory19.75 pointsCase example adequately describes at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Case example demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.2. Less Than Satisfactory18.5 pointsCase example inadequately describes at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Case example demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsCase example omits or incompletely describes at least one standardized assessment or screening that would be helpful with this patient. Case example does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Collaborative Services25 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team.5. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Health and Medical Questions Excellent25 pointsCase example expertly describes how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Case example demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.4. Good21.75 pointsCase example clearly describes how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team, and description is strong with sound analysis. Case example demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.3. Satisfactory19.75 pointsCase example adequately describes how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team, but description is limited. Case example demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.2. Less Than Satisfactory18.5 pointsCase example inadequately describes how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team, but description is weak. Case example demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsCase example omits or incompletely describes how the behavioral health provider would collaborate services with other providers on an integrated team. Case example does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Template Format12.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionCase example Format includes use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.5. Excellent12.5 pointsAll format elements are correct.4. Good10.88 pointsAppropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.3. Satisfactory9.88 pointsAppropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.2. Less Than Satisfactory9.25 pointsAppropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsTemplate is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Mechanics of Writing6.25 pointsCriteria DescriptionMechanics of Writing includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.5. Excellent6.25 pointsThe writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.4. Good5.44 pointsProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.3. Satisfactory4.94 pointsSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.2. Less Than Satisfactory4.63 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.Documentation of Sources6.25 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.5. Excellent6.25 pointsSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.4. Good5.44 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.3. Satisfactory4.94 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.2. Less Than Satisfactory4.63 pointsDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsSources are not documented.Total 125 points Order Now