(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

Explain why CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2 are important Explain why CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2 are important Explain why CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2 are important Details: This is an assignment for the Collaborative Learning Community (CLC). In class, you will be assigned to a group. To date, we have conducted extensive research. As you are aware, ethical considerations are critical throughout this process. After reading about Milgram’s compliance experiment and many of the early social psychology studies, it is clear that participants in social psychology have been harmed. In terms of research, the American Psychological Association’s Code of Ethics (2016) has safeguards in place. Institutional Review Boards have also been established to safeguard both human and animal research subjects. Assume your CLC group is a member of an Institutional Review Board (IRB), and someone like Phillip Zombardo or Stanley Milgram approaches you with a research proposal to carry out the same experiment (s). Task: Conduct some research and select an unethical study that has previously been conducted (e.g., Monster Study, Aversion Project, Dr. Money/David Reimer, Learned Helplessness). Other suggestions can be found by conducting a quick internet search. It is your responsibility to approve the study, approve with modifications, or reject the study entirely. Justify your group’s decision using the APA Code of Ethics. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx contains the code of ethics. Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding the title and reference slides) in which your group presents their decision. Your PowerPoint presentation should include: Give a synopsis of the experiment. Identify some broad ethical issues with the experiment. Using the APA Code of Ethics, identify at least five specific ethical codes that this study violated. Explain why CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2 are important. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Explain why CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2 are important There was a violation of the code. As an IRB, state whether you will approve the study, approve it with modifications, or reject it entirely. Assist yourself with two to three scholarly resources. Your textbook is a good starting point. The last slide should include a list of resources. Include speaker notes beneath each content-related slide that represent what would be said if the presentation were given in person. Extend on the information in the slide rather than simply restating it. Please make sure that the speaker notes contain 50-75 words per slide. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and source documentation should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, including an APA formatted reference slide, as found in the Student Success Center’s APA Style Guide. A rubric is used in this CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 assignment. Please review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become acquainted with the requirements for successful completion. This CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 assignment must be submitted to Turn-it-in. Please follow the steps outlined in the Student Success Center. PSY 362 DQ 1: Topic 2 How does the material in your textbook on self-presentation and social perception relate to the passage from Matthew 7:3-5, in which Jesus asks, “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brothers’ eye but pay no attention to the plank in your own?” How can you tell your brother, “Let me take the speck out of your eyes,” when you have a plank in your own eye all the time? You hypocrite, first remove the speck from your own eye, and then you will be able to see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” PSY 362 DQ 2 Topic 2 Describe three important self-functions. Please provide examples of each. Order Now