(240)-343-2585 info@essaymerit.com

Assignment: Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation Assignment: Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation Assignment: Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation Description The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities. This assignment consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation. Assessment/Interview Select a community of interest in your region. Perform a physical assessment of the community. Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community. Interview Guidelines Interviews can take place in-person, by phone, or by Skype. Develop interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community. Complete the “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form” prior to conducting the interview. Submit this document separately in its respective drop box. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit these with the presentation. PowerPoint Presentation Create a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and references slide) describing the chosen community interest. Include the following in your presentation: Description of community and community boundaries: the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level; ethnic and phenomenological features of the community, as well as types of social interactions; common goals and interests; and barriers, and challenges, including any identified social determinates of health. Summary of community assessment: (a) funding sources and (b) partnerships. Summary of interview with community health/public health provider. Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion. A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community. Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation – Rubric Collapse All Community Assessment And Analysis Presentation – RubricCollapse All Description of Community and Community Boundaries 25 points Criteria Description Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical, Financial, Educational Level, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges, Including Social Determinates of Health) 5. Excellent 25 points Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system. 4. Good 22.25 points Description of community and boundaries of community is complete, and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth. 3. Satisfactory 19.75 points Description of community and boundaries of community is complete. A brief description of all components is offered. 2. Less than Satisfactory 18.75 points Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete and missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Description of boundaries of community is omitted. Summary of Community Health Assessment 25 points Criteria Description Summary of Community Health Assessment 5. Excellent 25 points Discussion of functional health patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures. 4. Good 22.25 points Nursing process and functional health patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk, and potential for improved health. 3. Satisfactory 19.75 points Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each functional health pattern (FHP) is included. 2. Less than Satisfactory 18.75 points Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Community assessment is omitted. Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion 25 points Criteria Description Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion 5. Excellent 25 points Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is effectively included. 4. Good 22.25 points NA 3. Satisfactory 19.75 points NA 2. Less than Satisfactory 18.75 points Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is included but discussion is vague or incomplete 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is omitted. Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health 18.75 points Criteria Description Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health 5. Excellent 18.75 points Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations. 4. Good 16.69 points Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community. 3. Satisfactory 14.81 points Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings. 2. Less than Satisfactory 14.06 points Conclusion is incomplete or unclear. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Conclusion is omitted. Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider 18.75 points Criteria Description Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider 5. Excellent 18.75 points Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures. 4. Good 16.69 points Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community. 3. Satisfactory 14.81 points Summary table includes all functional health patterns with adequate documentation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 14.06 points Summary table is incomplete or unclear. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Summary table is omitted. Layout 6.25 points Criteria Description Layout 5. Excellent 6.25 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. 4. Good 5.56 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. 3. Satisfactory 4.94 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. 2. Less than Satisfactory 4.69 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 6.25 points Criteria Description Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5. Excellent 6.25 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. 4. Good 5.56 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. 3. Satisfactory 4.94 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. 2. Less than Satisfactory 4.69 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Total 125 points Order Now